Hair Transplantation Methods: Comparison
Many patients who come to see our practice are thoroughly confused about the types and methods for hair transplantation or restoration. We have found it best to fully educated our customers so they know what is best for them and their unique hair needs. Here we will discuss the comparison of hair transplantation methods.
The comparison of the FUE and FU Strip Method and MFU is sometimes complicated so during your free consultation, Dr. Zacco will create an individualized plan for you and explain your options. Together, Dr. Zacco and you will decide on a plan that is right for you.
A comparison of Hair Transplantation methods.
The chart below is a comparison of hair transplantation methods FUE, Strip Method, and MFU:
FUE | STRIP | MFU |
---|---|---|
Least best method to produce transplanted hair density | Good method for producing transplanted hair density | Best method to produce transplanted hair density |
The scarring is less noticeable once healed, and the hair can be worn shorter but no shorter than #2 clippers. There is no lineal scar. However, with a shaved scalp, the scar will look more unusual than the linear scar. | Linear scar. Hair needs to be worn longer in the sides and back to conceal the scar. No shorter than a #3 clippers in the back and sides | Same as Strip |
No suture is required | Sutures or staples are required for the donor area only | Same as Strip |
Optimal if relatively small number of grafts are required | Optimal if a large number of grafts are required. | Optimal of large number of grafts are required and much density is desired and donor tissue preservation is required. Best for density. |
This is one of the latest additions to the field of hair transplantation since the early 2000’s | This is a tried and proven technique in hair transplantation since the 1990’s | Same as Strip |
Patients with very curly hair are usually not a good candidate for FUE | Can accommodate any hair type. | Same as Strip |
Overall, FUE is about twice the cost | Overall, about ½ the cost of FUE | Same as Strip |
More transected follicles than Strip Method | Less transected follicles transplanted compared to FUE method | Least transected of all methods which means more hair growth per cm2 of tissue harvested. |
After a thorough evaluation, Dr. Arthur Zacco will answer all your questions and make sure that you have a complete understanding of your options.
Hair transplantation information can be confusing and even overwhelming to most patients so please take advantage of our free consultation so Dr. Arthur Zacco and staff can help you make the decision that is right for you.
Face to face consultations with our physician, Dr. Arthur Zacco or online consultations are also available.
Hair Restoration Raleigh NC
In our practice, we have encountered numerous patients who arrive feeling utterly bewildered by the vast array of hair transplantation or restoration options available to them. Recognizing their confusion as a barrier to making informed decisions, we firmly believe in thoroughly educating our customers regarding the various types and methods for hair transplantation. By doing so, we empower them to discern what best suits their unique hair needs. Here, let us delve into a comprehensive comparison of distinct hair transplantation methods that can help individuals navigate this complex landscape.
One of the most widely recognized techniques is Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT), which involves removing a strip of scalp from the donor area and subsequently dissecting it into individual follicular units before transplanting them onto balding areas. FUT yields remarkable results due to its ability to preserve ample grafts for large-scale transplants; however, it does leave behind an inconspicuous linear scar that may trouble those with shorter hairstyles.
Conversely, Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) represents another prominent option in hair transplantation methodology. This approach entails extracting individual follicular units directly from the donor area using specialized instruments before carefully implanting them onto recipient sites on the scalp. Notably advantageous for those seeking less invasive procedures and minimal scarring, FUE offers quicker recovery times compared to FUT while maintaining excellent natural-looking outcomes.